Show an ad over header. AMP

I am the FIRST!!!

The hands-free driving function on your car may be too polite for its own good

Assisted-driving features are supposed to make cars safer and relieve some of the monotony of driving, but if your robot sidekick's driving style doesn't match your own, it could lead to unexpected dangers.

The big picture: Reliable, fully driverless cars are still a long way off. Until then, motorists will share driving duties with partially automated, assisted-driving systems, and they need to know what to expect from them.


I almost got into trouble on a Detroit freeway recently when the 2021 Cadillac Escalade I was driving turned out to be far more cautious than I expected.

Background: The Caddy was equipped with Enhanced Super Cruise, GM's hands-free highway driving system, which is rated safest by Consumer Reports.

What happened: I steered the Escalade to the center lane of I-94, switched on Super Cruise and relaxed, placing my hands in my lap.

  • A few minutes later, the Escalade unexpectedly slowed from 66 mph to 49 mph.
  • Uncertain about what was happening, and with cars swerving to pass me on the left, I grabbed the wheel and accelerated, automatically disengaging Super Cruise.

What I knew: A driver in the right lane had been attempting to pass me on the right, but was prevented from doing so by a slower-moving vehicle in its own lane.

  • I — like most drivers would, in my opinion — dismissed the out-of-luck aggressive driver. But the Cadillac wanted to give him a wide berth.

What they're saying: GM engineers weren't in the car at the time, of course, but they told me later that the Escalade likely sensed the other vehicle was too close to my lane, and slowed as a precaution. The Escalade behaved as designed.

Yes, but: It was disconcerting because I didn't expect the car to be so polite. That's not how I drive — and the sudden slowdown actually seemed a little dangerous to me, given the surrounding traffic on the interstate.

The bottom line: Driving is often a series of split-second decisions. If the driver and their robot assistant aren't in tune, it could lead to a lack of trust — or in the worst case, even accidents.

  • People have different personalities behind the wheel. Maybe self-driving cars might, too, some day.

regular 4 post ff

infinite scroll 4 pff

Ford names James Farley as new CEO amid ongoing turnaround effort

Ford announced Tuesday that James Farley will take over as its next CEO, replacing James Hackett, 65, who is retiring after three years in the job.

Why it matters: It leaves Farley to complete the company's ongoing turnaround effort. The transition will be that much harder as the industry tries to navigate the coronavirus-induced economic slowdown which shuttered Ford plants for two months on the eve of some of its most important vehicle launches.

Keep reading...Show less

Supreme Court appears likely to save most of the Affordable Care Act

Most of the Affordable Care Act appeared likely to survive Tuesday as the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over the law’s individual mandate.

The big picture: Two members of the court’s conservative majority — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh — suggested they’re unlikely to throw out the entire health care law, as Republican attorneys general and the Trump administration have urged. Their votes would be enough to save it.

Keep reading...Show less

Biden's centrist words, liberal actions

President Biden talks like a soothing centrist. He promises to govern like a soothing centrist. But early moves show that he is keeping his promise to advance a liberal agenda.

Why it matters: Never before has a president done more by executive fiat in such a short period of time than Biden. And those specific actions, coupled with a push for a more progressive slate of regulators and advisers, look more like the Biden of the Democratic primary than the unity-and-restraint Biden of the general election.

Keep reading...Show less

New royals, new media

Megxit is Brexit all over again. That's the lesson from the explosive interview that future streaming stars Meghan Markle and her high-born husband gave to Oprah Winfrey on Sunday evening.

Why it matters: In Brexit, a group of old, white English people voted for the glories of an imagined past while rejecting a global, multicultural future. The main lesson of the interview is that the UK royal family, tied to a crumbling tabloid press, is behaving much the same way.

Keep reading...Show less

Insights

mail-copy

Get Goodhumans in your inbox

Most Read

More Stories
<!ENTITY lol2 “&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;“> <!ENTITY lol3 “&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;“> <!ENTITY lol4 “&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;“> ]> &lol4;