lorem ipsum dolor si amet is here.
I am the FIRST!!!

Get Goodhumans in your inbox
regular 4 post ff
infinite scroll 4 pff
Dec. 10, 2024 10:12AM EST
Jul. 08, 2020 02:45PM EST
Treasury points the finger at lenders over errors in PPP loan database
The U.S. Treasury Department is pointing the finger at lenders for errors discovered in Monday's PPP data disclosure.
What they're saying: "Companies listed had their PPP applications entered into SBA’s Electronic Transmission (ETran) system by an approved PPP lender. If a lender did not cancel the loan in the ETran system, the loan is listed," a senior administration official said.
This explanation makes the most sense for phantom loans like the one listed for e-scooter company Bird, given that the SBA shouldn't otherwise have its financial information.
What we still don't know, however, is how many errors were made. I'm now hearing more talk of audits, although it remains unclear exactly what form they would take.
There also was a ton of reporting yesterday about PPP loans received by companies with ties to people like Donald Trump, Jared Kushner, Nancy Pelosi, and Joe Biden.
- Such disclosure carries not just the intrinsic value of transparency for taxpayers, and also serve as receipts if politicians later criticize PPP or claim to have not really supported it.
- But, but, but: There isn't anything wrong with any of these connections, so long as the loan recipient was truthful in the application. PPP was primarily designed to keep people on payroll, whether a small-town bartender or a front-desk worker at a Trump-branded hotel. It was an intentionally blunt instrument that didn't discriminate by the wealth or connections of someone's employer.
What's next: Soon we could get a better picture about how many payrolls were actually protected, as loan forgiveness applications are submitted and processed.
- Treasury provided an estimate of 51 million jobs, but that's already coming under scrutiny (and not just because of phantom loans).
Keep reading...Show less
Oct. 05, 2020 09:00AM EST
In a pandemic winter, dinner comes with a side of propane
Americans' plans to socialize outside in colder weather — when COVID-19 will still be a threat to indoor gatherings — are prompting an expensive and environmentally questionable rush on outdoor heaters.
Why it matters: Heating outdoor patios is a big new cost for businesses, and the energy sources are almost always fossil fuels that contribute to climate change.
Where it stands: Nearly 50% of full-service restaurants say they’re taking actions to extend outdoor dining seasons, including patio heaters, according to a survey by the NationalRestaurant Association. Other businesses, like ski lodges, are also buying more outdoor heaters.
- Jeremy Sasson, president of Michigan-based Heirloom Hospitality, which runs three restaurants in the Detroit area, said he has increased the numbers of heaters he uses from eight or 10 in previous years to 25 this year.
- The cost of fuel for heating — which is just one of numerous wholly new categories of costs for restaurants in the pandemic — is about the same as some of his rents, Sasson said, coming in at around $200 a day.
- “I’m willing to spend the money to stay open,” said Sasson, who employs between 200 and 250 people. “It stabilizes the jobs within the restaurants.”
How it works: Propane, a liquid gas that comes from crude oil and natural gas, is typically the most popular type of energy source because it is freestanding and can be moved around. Electric heaters are another option, but are not mobile.
- Among fossil-fuel products, propane is the second cleanest behind natural gas, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
- Electric heaters may appear cleaner, but considering almost two-thirds of America’s electricity comes from natural gas and coal, they’re not cleaner and can actually be less efficient, according to experts.
- In any case, additional carbon emissions come with the use of outdoor heaters of any type unless renewable energy is powering an electric heater.
By the numbers: It's hard to pin down either the total number of heaters being used or the amount of energy being used given the lack of publicly available data. Some experts have nonetheless tried to crunch the numbers.
- Paul Sankey, an independent oil analyst, estimated that restaurants in New York City using outdoor heaters may consume about 1,600 barrels of propane a day.
- That’s compared to the approximately 100,000 barrels of propane typicallyused for commercial uses throughout the entire U.S., per U.S. Energy Information Administration data. Although this is a drop in the bucket, it's for just one (large) city.
- From an emissions perspective, the overall impact is likely small, but it’s still a whole new category of emissions being created when scientists are saying the world needs to cut emissions.
- Looking just at the fall season and estimating that maybe half of America’s roughly one million restaurants might use outdoor heaters, one environmentalist crunched numbers on behalf of Axios.
- This person, who doesn’t want to be named given the unofficial nature of the analysis, concluded such heaters could create 1.5 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year, which is 0.02% of today’s emissions.
The intrigue: New York City, which has one of the most aggressive climate-change plans of any city, is allowing more use of outdoor heaters, including propane, in the wake of the pandemic.
- “That doesn’t change our commitment to fighting climate change in New York City,” Mitch Schwartz, a spokesman for Mayor Bill de Blasio, said in an email to Axios. “It only means we’re in unusual times, and we’re going to do what it takes to support the restaurants that make our city great.”
- The move has prompted some local media to criticize the city and compare it to other leaders on climate change, namely France, which is banning outdoor heaters (however, only after this winter).
What we're watching: The booming propane business. Paraco, a New York-based propane company, usually sells 100,000 fuel tanks per month this time of year to New York City and surrounding areas. Now, it’s up to a monthly 250,000 tanks.
- Its sales in this category are up 200%, and one big-box store told the company its patio heater sales are up 1500%.
- Sankey describes it as “the seemingly all-but COVID-proof propane market.”
- Shortages are not expected — for now, per Paraco officials and other propane experts.
Editor’s note: This story has been corrected to say that two-thirds of U.S. electricity is generated by natural gas and coal (not natural gas and oil).
Keep reading...Show less
Oct. 27, 2020 08:18PM EST
22% of American adults either moved or know someone who did during the pandemic
For decades, the share of Americans moving to new cities has been falling. The pandemic-induced rise of telework is turning that trend around.
Why it matters: This dispersion of people from big metros to smaller ones and from the coasts to the middle of the country could be a boon for dozens of left-behind cities across the U.S.
By the numbers: 22% of American adults either moved or know someone who moved during the pandemic, according to a Pew Research Center survey.
- Flashback: Fewer than 10% of Americans moved to new places in 2019, the lowest rate since the Census Bureau began tracking domestic relocations in 1947.
The two biggest exoduses are out of New York City and San Francisco, per data from moving companies cited by Bloomberg's CityLab.
- HireAHelper said requests for help moving out of a New York or San Francisco home were 80% higher than requests to move in over the summer.
- United Van Lines saw moves out of New York and San Francisco jump 45% and 23%, respectively, during the summer months.
- And while many of the people moving out of these cities are going to other superstar metros — the top destination from San Francisco is Seattle, and the top destination from New York is Los Angeles — many other are relocating to smaller, up-and-coming cities, like Tampa Bay, Raleigh, Houston and Denver.
The impact: Before the pandemic, the top 15 most expensive cities in the country had just 19% of the population but the vast majority of business activity, writes Adam Ozimek, chief economist at Upwork, which connects freelancers to employers. Now, with remote work, 49% of business spend on Upwork's platform is going from those cities to lower-cost places, he notes.
- And while companies like Facebook and Microsoft have said they'll adjust workers' salaries according to the local cost of living if they move to less-expensive places, the relocation could still be worth it, Ozimek says.
- The price-to-income ratio — which is the ratio of the median price of a home to the median annual household income in a given area — in the top 15 most expensive cities is double (or more) than in the rest of U.S. cities.
But, but, but: The migration numbers have been inflated by the massive spike in young adults, aged 18–29, moving back home during the pandemic.
- "I think this is temporary," says University of Toronto urbanist Richard Florida. While nearly 30 million young people have moved back in with their parents since March, most of them will return to the big cities they left when the pandemic is behind us.
The bottom line: It's too early to tell whether American migration has made a true comeback, but the pandemic has — at least in part — shaken up a decades-long period of stagnation in the country.
Keep reading...Show less


