I am the FIRST
regular 4 post ff
infinite scroll 4 pff
Oct. 22, 2020 08:00PM EST
How the coronavirus pandemic might end
It's still the early days of the coronavirus pandemic, but history, biology and the knowledge gained from our first nine months with COVID-19 point to how the pandemic might end.
The big picture: Pandemics don't last forever. But when they end, it usually isn't because a virus disappearsor is eliminated. Instead, they can settle into a population, becoming a constant background presence that occasionally flares up in local outbreaks.
- Many emerging viruses become part of the viral ecology. The four coronaviruses that cause the common cold are endemic, circulating in the population, and the influenza strains that cause seasonal flu predictably surge each year.
- The SARS outbreak in 2003 didn't go the same way due to biology and behavior: It wasmuch less transmissible than the virus that causes COVID-19, countries contained it quickly, and it has pretty much disappeared.
- One virus, smallpox, was eradicated through widespread vaccination, and polio may be close, after decades of effort and billions in funding.
What's happening: The pandemic is deepening in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere in the world.
- Experts — from the U.K.'s chief scientific adviser to pharmaceutical CEOs to the WHO — increasingly say SARS-CoV-2 is likely to circulate in the population on a permanent basis, mainly due to the foothold the virus has already established.
- But what damage endemic COVID-19 causes will depend on different factors, including how often people are reinfected, vaccine effectiveness and adoption, and if the virus mutates in any significant way.
"If the vaccine is really effective, like the measles vaccine or the yellow fever vaccine, it's just going to land like a ton of bricks and suffocate this. Maybe not quite eradicate it — yellow fever and measles are not eradicated — but it'll be an utter game changer," UC Irvine epidemiologist Andrew Noymer says.
- But if the vaccines are less effective — as many experts expect for at least the first generation — COVID-19 may eventually behave more like the seasonal flu, Noymer says. (Still, the death rate of COVID-19 currently well eclipses that of the seasonal flu.)
Reinfection is "the big issue," says Columbia University's Jeffrey Shaman, who recently described how reinfection and other factors would affect the spread of SARS-CoV-2 if it became endemic.
- So far, there are just a handful of documented reinfection cases, but evidence about whether people retain their antibodies after infection is mixed, and a lot of unknowns remain about the likelihood of reinfection.
- The worst-case scenario would be that there isn’t a vaccine or long-lasting immunity and people get COVID-19 repeatedly and are just as likely to end up in the hospital as with initial infections, Shaman says.
"I would say COVID-19 is already endemic," says Larry Brilliant, an epidemiologist who worked to eradicate smallpox and now chairs the nonprofit Ending Pandemics.
- With about 59,000 new cases per day in the U.S. alone, Brilliant says "it is already everywhere."
- "It doesn’t really mean very much if it is endemic," he adds. "The real question is: How does it all end?"
Eventually, COVID-19 could end up in "the retirement village of coronaviruses," like HIV, which today can be treated to the point of elimination, or circulate at low levels and be kept in check with a vaccine, like measles, Brilliant says, laying out a handful of possible scenarios.
- Noymer says he suspects that after its "cataclysmic emergence," COVID-19 may eventually fade into a common cold after a decade or so.
What's next: "We have to work with it as a virus that we will be contending with for years possibly," Shaman says. "It doesn’t mean an effective vaccine or treatment won’t be developed. What it means is that holding out hope that we’re going to just get a vaccine and not doing anything else is not the level of preparation we need."
- Until we have an effective vaccine and better contact tracing and testing, Johns Hopkins University epidemiologist Justin Lessler says public health measures should continue encouraging the use of face masks and social distancing.
- If the disease does become endemic, Lessler says it's likely to eventually become more like a childhood infection because adults will gradually build an immunity. And since children tend to have fewer complications, "it will no longer be the same sort of burden to health that it is now."
The good news: Viruses can sometimes become milder with time, treatments are already becoming more effective and vaccines can be improved.
- "Right now we are frightened, depressed and on our back heels. We will be able to conquer this disease," Brilliant says. "It will be a matter of time and science."
Keep reading...Show less
Mar. 24, 2021 12:43AM EST
Lindsey Graham invokes Trump to sell Senate GOP on restoring earmarks
Sen. Lindsey Graham has been using Donald Trump to sell skeptical fellow Senate Republicans on bringing back earmarks.
Why it matters: Both parties swore off member-directed spending a decade ago, saying it too often led to corruption. Democrats are bringing it back this year, House Republicans agree — yet Senate Republicans remain the final holdouts.
- Graham told colleagues last week "the top Republican in the country, meaning Trump, supports earmarks, and why shouldn't we?"
- The South Carolinian invoked the former president and Republican leader-in-exile as the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee held a closed-door meeting to discuss the road ahead for government spending.
- A source inside the room in the Capitol paraphrased Graham's argument.
In a telephone interview with Axios on Monday evening, Graham confirmed he'd made a forceful case to his colleagues.
- "Democrats do it; if we don't do it, we're stupid," Graham said he argued.
- He said Democrats will gain political advantage if they can direct money to competitive states while their counterparts don't. "We shouldn't just be out of the game."
- Graham doesn't buy the two main arguments against earmarks: that corruption is inevitable or that they inherently lead to more government spending.
- Transparency in the process can protect against corruption, he said. And halting earmarks didn't lead to reduced spending.
Advocates have argued earmarks incentivize bipartisan dealmaking, since members of both parties get invested in legislation when it contains spending especially directed toward their individual districts.
- They also argue their past abuses can be prevented with public disclosure of earmarks, a ban on directing them to private companies and a limit on their size.
Between the lines: Graham made his comments as the Appropriations Committee members discussed earmarks and the fact that the three other corners of Capitol Hill had green-lighted the practice.
- Graham acknowledged Senate Republicans' resistance but noted that House Republicans also had been vehement public critics — until backing member-directed spending in a secret vote.
What we're watching: Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the top-ranking Republican on Appropriations, told Axios the reversal by House Republicans "helps create the dynamic" to win approval for earmarks in the Senate.
- He and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the committee chairman, "are talking about it; we're friends," adding, "I think we have a constitutional right ... to control the money, the Congress does."
The big picture: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has publicly cast doubt about whether his conference will bring back earmarks.
- On Fox News' "Special Report" last month, host Bret Baier noted that under President George W. Bush, McConnell was a proponent of earmarks — and asked whether it made sense to "restore the spending authority that essentially went to the executive branch."
- McConnell replied, "I represent the entire conference," and that the "overwhelming majority ... is not in favor of going back to earmarks."
What's next: A Senate leadership source said the earmarks question won't be resolved until next month.
- That will "almost certainly" be at a special GOP conference meeting — and by secret ballot, should a vote be requested.
Keep reading...Show less
Dec. 10, 2024 10:12AM EST
Dec. 08, 2024 10:04PM EST