Show an ad over header. AMP

I am the FIRST!!!

Supreme Court upholds GOP voting restrictions in Arizona

The Supreme Court today upheld a pair of voting restrictions in Arizona, likely paving the way for new limitations across the country.

Why it matters: It's the court’s biggest voting rights decision in several years. Conservatives’ victory in the 6-3 ruling, authored by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, is a sign of what’s to come.


Details: The case concerned two voting restrictions in Arizona. The state invalidates ballots that are cast in the wrong precinct, and it also bans the practice known as “ballot harvesting,” in which third parties collect and return other people’s ballots.

  • Democrats argued those rules end up disproportionately affecting voters of color, and that they therefore violate the Voting Rights Act. “Ballot harvesting,” for example, is particularly useful to the state’s Native population, Democrats said, because polling places can be far away and mail service isn’t always reliable.

In a 6-3 ruling, the court said neither of Arizona's rules amounts to racial discrimination.

Context: The stakes in this case are high because it implicates what’s left of the Voting Rights Act.

  • The Supreme Court in 2013 effectively invalidated the "preclearance" provision of the Voting Rights Act, which used to require states and local governments to clear voting rule changes with the federal government if they had a history of discrimination.
  • All that’s left now is to challenge new rules after they take effect under a different provision of the law.
  • In today’s case, Democrats and voting-rights advocates feared not only that the court would uphold Arizona’s specific restrictions, but that it would also close the door — or begin closing the door — to many other after-the-fact challenges.

The big picture: As long as state legislatures don’t cross the line into overt racial discrimination, they will get wide latitude from the courts to change the rules that govern their elections.

  • The court has already invalidated the heart of the Voting Rights Act. And it ruled in 2019 that federal courts can’t even consider any limits on partisan gerrymandering — another tool that state-level majorities use to preserve their power.
  • Today's decision is another step in the same direction.

regular 4 post ff

infinite scroll 4 pff

5 Reasons Why We Decided To Homeschool

First things first. We have a deep respect for the public school system and teachers in general. We have several friends and family members that are educators. This post is not a manifesto for why everyone should drop the public system and start homeschooling their children. In fact, it's not meant to sway you in one way or the other. It's simply a chronicle of the thought process that Lynn and I employed when making the final decision this year to give homeschool a shot.

Choosing to home school our children wasn't an easy or quick decision, which it shouldn't be. But we considered every option and weighed the pros vs the cons. We made our ultimate decision based on what is best for our children and our family.

Education is a critical part of every child's development. So it's no wonder that parents (and even non-parents) are so passionate about schooling.

We're no different.

Yet we've still been on the receiving end of the awkward glances and ill-worded reactions when we explain that we're taking education in-house. I get it. It's different. It's not in the mainstream, and that's OK.

So let me outline for you our 5 core reasons for traveling this path.

Keep reading... Show less

Insights

mail-copy

Get Goodhumans in your inbox

Most Read

More Stories
]> &lol4;