Show an ad over header. AMP

Some experts question the ethics of the government's coronavirus vaccine plan

The first vaccination sites are expected to receive coronavirus vaccines today, the next step of an extraordinary endeavor that's brought us to the beginning of the end of the pandemic.

Yes, but: The virus continues to devastate communities across the country at record levels, causing some experts to question the ethics of how the government is distributing the first vaccines.


What's happening: The initial batch of doses available to Americans is extremely limited, and each recipient must get two shots.

  • That means that of of the 6.4 million available doses of Pfizer's vaccine, roughly half are being sent out at first — 2.9 million, per the NYT. The other half will be distributed in a few weeks, to ensure that recipients receive their second shot 21 days after the first.

Between the lines: Some experts are questioning whether any doses should be held back given how acute the crisis is, and how many vulnerable people's lives may be saved by receiving even one dose of the vaccine.

  • Pfizer has promised 20 million doseswill be available by the end of the year, making the decision to hold some of the initial doses back even more ethically fraught, the experts say.
  • "What I’m asking is whether it is ethical to hold back those doses to be 100% sure the 2nd shot happens exactly in 21 days, or whether it is better to not hold back those doses, vaccinate twice as many people, and take a small risk that the Pfizer doses as promised don’t arrive as planned by end of year and some people are delayed in that 2nd dose," said Walid Gellad, a professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh.
  • "We know the first dose has an effect, and we are at the peak of this pandemic," he added.

Details: Pfizer's clinical trials results have indicated that even one dose of its vaccine confers some degree of protection upon the recipient.

  • "We know the first dose is partially protective," former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb told CNBC's Squawk Box. "You want to try to push out as many doses as possible to give as many people as possible some benefit."
  • "There is some wiggle room in terms of when they receive that second dose," Gottlieb added.

The other side: "The reason why we're holding on to the second dose as well as some reserve is that we don't have absolute confidence in the cadence, not because Pfizer or Moderna or the supporting manufacturers...aren't diligent in their process, but it is such a delicate process, we want to ensure perfection in the vaccine," Army Gen. Gustave Perna, who is with Operation Warp Speed,told reporters on Saturday.

  • As time goes on, the need to hold back doses will diminish, Perna said. "Holding the second dose is just until we have ultimate confidence and we've built up stocks to ensure that we can get the American people their second dose."

The big picture: There's a larger scientific conversation around how to handle the clinical trial results. Some scientistshave warned emphatically that giving only one dose to people is a bad idea, even if it'd double the number of people who could be vaccinated in the short-term.

  • "It will be an absolute disaster if a large number of people only take one dose of the vaccine. It is very likely that protective immunity will wane rapidly in individuals who only take the first shot and efficacy will be nowhere near the 95% reported after the two-dose regimen," tweeted Carlos del Rio, executive associate dean for Emory School of Medicine & Grady Health System..
  • "Too much uncertainty in short- and long-term efficacy," agreed Natalie Dean, a professor specializing in vaccine study design at the University of Florida. "And the optics of changing the plan now, for a regimen that hasn’t been tested directly, are not great."

But some argue that we should at least study a one-dose regimen.

  • "*IF* a single dose DOES work in less vulnerable [people] and IS sufficiently durable (even if not perfect), it might mean vaccinating billions of additional people in 2021 & reach herd immunity faster," tweeted Michael Mina, a professor of epidemiology at Harvard University.

Financial fallout from the Texas deep freeze

Texas has thawed out after an Arctic freeze last month threw the state into a power crisis. But the financial turmoil from power grid shock is just starting to take shape.

Why it matters: In total, electricity companies are billions of dollars short on the post-storm payments they now owe to the state's grid operator. There's no clear path for how they will pay — something being watched closely across the country as extreme weather events become more common.

Keep reading... Show less

Chamber of Commerce decides against widespread political ban following Capitol insurrection

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce revealed Friday it won't withhold political donations from lawmakers who simply voted against certifying the presidential election results and instead decide on a case-by-case basis.

Why it matters: The Chamber is the marquee entity representing businesses and their interests in Washington. Its memo, obtained exclusively by Axios, could set the tone for businesses debating how to handle their candidate and PAC spending following the Jan. 6 Capitol attack.

Keep reading... Show less

Scoop: CDC lets child migrant shelters fill to 100% despite COVID concern

The Centers for Disease Control is allowing shelters handling child migrants who cross the U.S.-Mexico border to expand to full capacity, abandoning a requirement they stay near 50% to inhibit the spread of the coronavirus, Axios has learned.

Why it matters: The fact the country's premier health advisory agency is permitting a change in COVID-19 protocols indicates the scale of the immigration crisis. A draft memo obtained by Axios conceded "facilities should plan for and expect to have COVID-19 cases."

Keep reading... Show less

8 Senate Democrats vote against adding $15 minimum wage amendment to COVID relief

Eight Democratic senators on Friday voted against Sen. Bernie Sanders' amendment to ignore a ruling by the Senate parliamentarian and add a $15 minimum wage provision to the $1.9 trillion COVID relief package.

The state of play: The vote was held open for hours on Friday afternoon — even after every senator had voted — due to a standoff in negotiations over the next amendments that the Senate is set to take up.

Keep reading... Show less

CDC: Easing mask mandates, re-opening restaurants led to higher COVID cases, deaths

Easing mask restrictions and on-site dining have increased COVID-19 cases and deaths, according to a study out Friday from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Why it matters: The report's findings converge with actions from governors this week easing mask mandates and announcing plans to reopen nonessential businesses like restaurants.

Keep reading... Show less

Exclusive: GOP Leader McCarthy asks to meet with Biden about the border

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has requested a meeting with President Biden to discuss the rising numbers of unaccompanied migrant children at the U.S.-Mexico border, in a letter sent on Friday.

Why it matters: Biden is facing criticism from the right and the left as agency actions and media reports reveal spiking numbers of migrant children overwhelming parts of the U.S. immigration system. Recent data shows an average of 321 kids being referred to migrant shelters each day, as Axios reported.

Keep reading... Show less

Public desire for vaccine increases to 69%, but with partisan divide

69% of the public intends to get a COVID vaccine or already has, up significantly from 60% in November, according to a report out Friday from the Pew Research Center.

Yes, but: The issue has become even more partisan, with 56% of Republicans who say they want or have already received a coronavirus vaccine compared to 83% of Democrats.

Keep reading... Show less

China's highly anticipated 5-year plan is hazy on climate

China's highly anticipated 5-year plan revealed on Friday provides little new information about its climate initiatives, leaving plenty to discuss in multinational meetings this year and lots of blanks for China to fill in later.

Driving the news: The top-line targets for 2025, per state media, aim to lower energy intensity by 13.5% and carbon emissions intensity by 18% — that is, measures of energy use and emissions relative to economic output.

Keep reading... Show less

Insights

mail-copy

Get Goodhumans in your inbox

Most Read

More Stories