- Blinken told CNN in March that the Biden administration has "real concerns about the methodology and the process that went into that report, including the fact that the government in Beijing apparently helped to write it."
What they're saying: "Phase 2 of the COVID origins study must be launched with terms of reference that are transparent, science-based, and give international experts the independence to fully assess the source of the virus and the early days of the outbreak," Becerra said at the virtual meeting.
- NIAID director Anthony Fauci said at a White House briefing Tuesday he believed the coronavirus originated from a "natural occurrence," but further investigation was needed.
Of note: Becerra also addressed the Chinese government's opposition to the WHO granting recognition to Taiwan.
- "Global collaboration will be key in tackling the many challenges still before us. Collaboration with non-state actors must continue, and we must invite Taiwan to be a part of the World Health Assembly as an observer," Becerra said.
Flashback: The report identified the four possible origins of the virus:
- Direct zoonotic spillover, which was deemed "possible to likely;"
- Introduction through an intermediate host, regarded as 'likely to very likely;
- Introduction through cold/ food chain products, which was considered to be "possible" and;
- "Introduction through a laboratory incident" — which the WHO team said was "extremely unlikely.
The other side: Zhao Lijian, a spokesperson for China's foreign ministry said following criticism of the released report, "The U.S. has been speaking out on the report. By doing this, isn’t the U.S. trying to exert political pressure on the members of the WHO expert group?"
