I am the FIRST!!!
regular 4 post ff
infinite scroll 4 pff
Facebook removes Trump ads tying refugees to COVID-19
Facebook said Wednesday that it was removing a series of ads from President Trump's campaign that linked American acceptance of refugees with increased coronavirus risk, a connection Facebook says is without merit.
Why it matters: The ads were pulled after they received thousands of impressions and are a sign that the Trump campaign continues to test the limits of social media rules on false information.
“We rejected these ads because we don’t allow claims that people’s physical safety, health, or survival is threatened by people on the basis of their national origin or immigration status,” Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone said in a statement.
The big picture: The move comes as the social media platforms prepare for an intense period through the November election and until the race is decided. Facebook said last week it wouldn't allow ads that prematurely declare victory and has also said it will stop allowing new political ads a week before Election Day.
- On Wednesday, it said it was expanding its election-related policy to limit additional types of ads that could interfere with voting.
"We also won’t allow ads with content that seeks to delegitimize the outcome of an election," Facebook's Rob Leathern said in a series of tweets. "For example, this would include calling a method of voting inherently fraudulent or corrupt, or using isolated incidents of voter fraud to delegitimize the result of an election."
Yes, but: The new rules about voting content apply to ads on Facebook and Instagram. Facebook will not take down organic posts that contain such charges, but will label them.
Meanwhile: Twitter said it removed 130 accounts that it said appeared to be from Iran and were "attempting to disrupt the public conversation" during Tuesday's debate. The company said it acted on information provided by the FBI.
Billionaire philanthropist Robert Smith's tax fraud roils Vista Equity
Robert Smith's admission to tax fraud has done more than just cost him a whopping $140 million. It's also roiled Vista Equity Partners, the private equity firm he founded and leads, with some insiders and limited partners feeling they were misled (or left in the dark) about the extent of Smith's legal troubles.
Behind the scenes: Smith called a virtual meeting of Vista's managing directors and other top staffers on Wednesday, to discuss details of his settlement. A source says he called the overall experience "humbling" and that he regretted the "undue burden" that his actions had put on others, including some Vista colleagues.
Smith also said that Brian Sheth, Vista's co-founder and president, is likely to be leaving Vista. Sheth himself was not on the call, and it does not appear that he was invited to participate.
- Sheth, long considered one of Vista's top dealmakers, had told managing directors last December that he was thinking about leaving the firm or retiring.
- But he had not yet made any formal decision, nor have he and Smith discussed specifics of how a departure would be structured. Complexities include his existing firm economics, fund "key man" clauses, etc.
- Sources say that Smith's tax troubles are a contributing factor to a breakdown in the two men's relationship, and that Smith's meeting comments raised some eyebrows.
- Expect Dyal Capital Partners, which has twice purchased minority stakes in Vista, to have some say in the final resolution.
Of note: Sheth did not return a request for comment, while a Vista spokesman also declined comment.
One of Smith's biggest internal challenges is a perception that he long underplayed the severity of the investigation — presenting it as a relatively minor accounting problem. Or not raising it at with certain limited partners, save perhaps for a minor data room mention.
- But, yesterday, the U.S. Attorney's press release was much more biting, calling it an "illegal scheme to conceal income and evade millions in taxes."
- It added that Smith did so "knowingly and intentionally," which reads a bit different from Smith's narrative of being a naive young investor who went along to get along with the tax structures proposed by an older, more experienced limited partner.
- That LP was Robert Brockman, who yesterday was charged with what DOJ calls the "largest ever" tax fraud scheme by a U.S. citizen. Smith is cooperating in that ongoing investigation.
- Smith and Vista are said not to be concerned about a subsequent SEC investigation into Smith's continuing ability to run a securities firm, but I'm not quite sure why they're so confident. Particularly if new sheriffs roll into down next year, and they're not thrilled with the fact that Smith's fat bank account is largely what kept him out of jail.
- Read the full findings of facts.
The bottom line: Smith has settled with DOJ and the IRS, but the story isn't over yet.
Businesses with more diverse boards came out on top during the pandemic
There's a fresh data pointon how corporate America fared during the pandemic year. Businesses with more diverse boards came out on top, according to data provided first to Axios by BoardReady, a nonprofit.
Why it matters: It adds to a ballooning body of research that shows that generally better business comes alongside boardrooms that are less old, male and white.
To be clear, the data doesn't prove companies did better because their boards were more diverse — there is a slew of other factors that play a role.
What they're saying: "There isn't enough data yet to show causation, but there's strong correlation," says Deanna Oppenheimer, founder of BoardReady.
By the numbers: As a cohort, the companies with more women on their boards saw the smallest year-over-year drop in revenue growth in 2020.
- And a group of companies with board members whose ages spanned over 30 years saw an improvement in revenue growth compared to the prior year. The rest saw growth slow.
- The businesses with at least 30% of seats filled by non-white executives saw a bigger jump in revenue growth. However, those that had between 20% and 30% non-white board executives fared worse than those with fewer non-white members.
- BoardReady cautions that this data might be skewed because so few companies have enough non-white executives on their boards to meet that threshold.
What to watch: The data comes as there's a sea change of sorts in corporate America. Legislators, regulators and the Nasdaq are eyeing the makeup of corporations' top decision-makers — and pushing them to step it up on diversity.
- "People used to ask the question: 'Why diversify?' The debate has now moved on from why to how," says Oppenheimer.
Where it stands: The numbers are improving, though still dismal.
- For instance, women made up 28% of all S&P 500 corporate board members last year, per a recent study by Spencer Stuart. That's up from 16% in 2010.
Worth noting: BoardReady used revenue as a yardstick — rather than say, profits or EBITDA — to avoid the data being distorted by any adjustments companies made during the pandemic, the study says.
Go deeper: Read the report




