Show an ad over header. AMP

I am the FIRST!!!

Businesses with more diverse boards came out on top during the pandemic

Data: BoardReady; Chart: Connor Rothschild/Axios

There's a fresh data pointon how corporate America fared during the pandemic year. Businesses with more diverse boards came out on top, according to data provided first to Axios by BoardReady, a nonprofit.

Why it matters: It adds to a ballooning body of research that shows that generally better business comes alongside boardrooms that are less old, male and white.


To be clear, the data doesn't prove companies did better because their boards were more diverse — there is a slew of other factors that play a role.

What they're saying: "There isn't enough data yet to show causation, but there's strong correlation," says Deanna Oppenheimer, founder of BoardReady.

By the numbers: As a cohort, the companies with more women on their boards saw the smallest year-over-year drop in revenue growth in 2020.

  • And a group of companies with board members whose ages spanned over 30 years saw an improvement in revenue growth compared to the prior year. The rest saw growth slow.
  • The businesses with at least 30% of seats filled by non-white executives saw a bigger jump in revenue growth. However, those that had between 20% and 30% non-white board executives fared worse than those with fewer non-white members.
  • BoardReady cautions that this data might be skewed because so few companies have enough non-white executives on their boards to meet that threshold.

What to watch: The data comes as there's a sea change of sorts in corporate America. Legislators, regulators and the Nasdaq are eyeing the makeup of corporations' top decision-makers — and pushing them to step it up on diversity.

  • "People used to ask the question: 'Why diversify?' The debate has now moved on from why to how," says Oppenheimer.

Where it stands: The numbers are improving, though still dismal.

Worth noting: BoardReady used revenue as a yardstick — rather than say, profits or EBITDA — to avoid the data being distorted by any adjustments companies made during the pandemic, the study says.

Go deeper: Read the report

regular 4 post ff

infinite scroll 4 pff

GOP struggles to get on same page on infrastructure

Republicans are all over the map about how their party should proceed on the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure proposal.

What we're hearing: GOP strategists tell Axios they've struggled over not only whether they support the current Senate negotiations but how to message off the broader infrastructure debate.

Keep reading...Show less

Senate Democrats announce $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation package

Senate Democrats on the Budget committee announced late Tuesday that they have reached a deal on a $3.5 trillion package to address "human" infrastructure, which they plan to pass via reconciliation.

Why it matters: The price tag comes in far below the $6 trillion figure Sen. Bernie Sanders, chairman of the committee, and other progressive Democrats have pushed for.

Editor's note: This a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.

Podcast: The art and business of political polling

The election is just eight days away, and it’s not just the candidates whose futures are on the line. Political pollsters, four years after wrongly predicting a Hillary Clinton presidency, are viewing it as their own judgment day.

Axios Re:Cap digs into the polls, and what pollsters have changed since 2016, with former FiveThirtyEight writer and current CNN politics analyst Harry Enten.

Insights

mail-copy

Get Goodhumans in your inbox

Most Read

More Stories
<!ENTITY lol2 “&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;&lol;“> <!ENTITY lol3 “&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;&lol2;“> <!ENTITY lol4 “&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;&lol3;“> ]> &lol4;